Link Roundup 2.25.05 - From Zack

I just haven't had any time lately to write these due to some work i'm doing on an electoral reform conference being held this weekend in Los Angeles. National experts will conduct teach in's as well as show the various documentary films and footage that are either finished or in the works that detail election day abuses and the inherent problems that a corporate controlled, made for stealing, electronic democracy poses.

 
Let's begin on a lighter note...or a more serious one depending on how you look at it...here's our twice un-elected-elected President:
 
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. Having said that, all options are on the table," Bush said.
 
No Child Left Behind...the facts are in...just what we, and teachers been saying all along! I just love how the media has been so quiet on this story for so long...this report forced them to do something at least:

"Concluding a yearlong study on the effectiveness of President Bush's sweeping education law, No Child Left Behind, a bipartisan panel of lawmakers drawn from many states yesterday pronounced it a flawed, convoluted and unconstitutional education reform initiative that had usurped state and local control of public schools."
 
And, yes, the right wing found someone to offer the counter position...none other than a rountable of corporate executives!! Thanks media for giving them a prominent say on a study by experts in education!! Why do they deserve to be quoted, why does the media need the fallacy of "balance"?:
 
"My big concern is they did a better job of pinpointing problems than identifying solutions," said Susan Traiman, a director at the Business Roundtable, a group that represents top corporate executives. "Most of what they call for would be a reversal that would turn back the clock on what N.C.L.B. is trying to accomplish, all in the name of federalism."
 
 
Maureen Dowd on the return of the Swift Boaters!! This time their target is seniors, not a war hero, and this time its to privatize social security. And they even found a way to bring in gay marriage and being against troops to demogoge AARP:
 
"...USA Next, which has spent millions on Republican policy fights, has pledged to spend as much as $10 million on ads and other tactics to "dynamite" AARP and get Americans to rip up Social Security. It's hiring some of the same consultants who helped the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who dynamited John Kerry, a war hero, by sliming him as a war criminal. The USA Next group intends to combine the two ruthless success stories of the Bush re-election: the Swiftian tactic of amplifying its vicious and dishonest attacks through the media, and the Rovian tactic of hanging gay marriage like an anvil around the neck of a foe.

It began with an almost comically hyperbolic Internet ad that briefly ran on The American Spectator's Web site, painting AARP as pro-gay sex - even though it's tough to think of AARP and steamy lust in the same hot breath - and anti-soldier. Senator Jon Corzine of New Jersey sent a letter to President Bush yesterday calling the USA Next ad "incendiary" and asking him to denounce such tactics.
 
But, of course, President Bush has nothing whatsoever to do with any of this. Right?
 
 
Check out the Hitchens article in Vanity Fair I mentioned last week. Ohio WAS stolen, its all in the evidence.
 
Ivins doing her thing.
 
Robert Scheer the same...
 
and mark morford on Hunter S...these two are a great pair as well.
 
And, our imbecile of a Governor who prides himself on "kicking ass" on nurses and teachers and kissing up to big corporations (who, under his rules, are not special interests, but nurses and teachers are...huh????) is finally being exposed more regularly, and better, his poll numbers have gone down 10 points in the past 2 months...its a start:
 
"Schwarzenegger made headlines in recent months by deriding political opponents as "girlie men" and ridiculing a group of nurses at a women's conference. Now, an effort to paint the state's teachers as little more than a balky special interest group has angered many critics, who have begun to question why constituencies dominated by women have been subjected to such tough talk.
 
"He behaves like an arrogant patriarch with respect to women's occupations," said Rose Ann De Moro, executive director of the California Nurses Association. "Nurses, teachers, home health workers — it's vulgar how he's run roughshod over them. He's arrogant, and he's a bully."
 
As a candidate, Schwarzenegger was dogged by allegations that he had groped and humiliated women on movie sets. In December, a small group of nurses gathered at a state women's conference to protest Schwarzenegger's decision to side with hospitals and delay changes to the state's nurse-to-patient ratio. With Shriver in the audience, Schwarzenegger responded to the protesters by saying, "The special interests don't like me in Sacramento because I am always kicking their butts."
 
"The arrogance of taking on teachers, nurses and other professions where women are underpaid, overworked and vital to society is beyond the pale," said Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and a frequent Schwarzenegger critic. "But Arnold is someone who treats women as objects, so it's natural for him to have a tendency to disregard and devalue professions that are made up of women."
 
The teachers union is running radio commercials statewide criticizing the governor's proposals. Top officials of the organization, as well as some school administrators, also have accused Schwarzenegger of reneging on a promise to deliver $2 billion in revenue to schools (they didn't just accuse, HE DID RENEGE, god the media sucks). The nurses uinon has taken out full-page newspaper ads suggesting Schwarzenegger's corporate campaign donors are the real special interests.
 
Last week, some 300 nurses and their supporters disrupted a movie premiere in Sacramento, booing Schwarzenegger as he posed with actors Vince Vaughn and The Rock.
"A mass movement is developing, and it's fascinating to see women coming together," DeMoro of the nurses union said.
 
Guckerts work to slander and defeat Dashcle also coming out:
 
Guckert, who quit his job at Talon News two weeks ago, after it was learned he had used the alias Jeff Gannon and had ties to several sex sites, took on the Argus Leader last year in at least a dozen articles in which he sought to link the paper to Daschle or claim a bias by the paper against Daschle's opponent, John Thune. "He mainly wanted to know about areas that made the paper look bad," Executive Editor Randell Beck told E&P Tuesday. "Our alleged bias -- he would keep coming back to that even though there was no proof."
 
Among the attempts by Guckert to portray the paper as biased in favor of Daschle was a story that Daschle and Argus Leader political reporter Dave Kranz attended South Dakota State University at the same time. "They did know each other there," Beck acknowledged. "But that was all. He took things like that and tried to put it together and make two plus two equal five."
 
Don't Give Gannon A Pass...C'mon media...just pretendt Clinton is President

By now, almost everyone's heard of Jeff Gannon/James Guckert. He's the fake reporter with a false name given all-too-real press credentials by the White House. He's known for asking biased, leading questions during press briefings before finally being exposed a month ago as a right-wing operative with no journalism experience, a fake name, and a shady past. There are some serious ethical, professional and national security issues at stake. Now, "Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) is circulating a letter among his colleagues that asks President Bush to launch an investigation" into how Gannon gained access to White House press briefings without any journalistic qualifications. Durbin and other concerned lawmakers are adding their voices to a previous investigation request by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), as well as a subpoena request by two leaders of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Reps. John Conyers (D-MI) and Louise Slaughter (D-NY), who want federal prosecutors to gain access to a record Gannon kept of his time over the past two years. Here are some basic questions that must be answered by the White House:

HOW LONG CAN JOURNALISTS GAIN ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE WITHOUT AN FBI BACKGROUND CHECK? Most White House journalists have what is called a "hard pass," a permanent pass obtained after undergoing a rigorous FBI background check. Gannon skipped over that step. Instead, as Salon's Eric Boehlert explains, "the White House waved him into press briefings for nearly two years using what's called a day pass." Now, day passes are special exceptions that are "designed for temporary use by out-of-town reporters who need access to the White House, not for indefinite use by reporters." If the background check is necessary for reporters with extended access to the White House, why were the rules circumvented for Gannon? Is there a limit to how long a reporter can slide on "day" passes, as Gannon did for years?

HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS TWO MONTHS BEFORE HIS SUPPOSED PUBLICATION EVEN EXISTED? Bush Press Secretary Scott McClellan admitted the White House gave Gannon his first day press pass in February 2003. The problem: His "publication," Talon News, didn't exist until April 2003.

BY WHAT CRITERIA DID THE WHITE HOUSE EVALUATE TALON NEWS? Talon News is the brainchild of a Republican activist from Texas, Bobby Eberle. Eberle, who runs the aptly named "GOPUSA," told the New York Times he created Talon News because he wanted to quietly construct a news service with a conservative slant: "if someone were to see 'GOPUSA,' there's an instant built-in bias there." In denying Gannon a pass, the congressional press office pointed out Gannon was unable to show that "Talon News has any paid subscribers." They also found that while actual working reporters can show their principal income comes from reporting stories for publication in actual news services, Talon's "paying a single reporter a 'stipend' does not meet the intent of the rule." As the Washington Post's Dana Milbank put it, Gannon was "representing a phony media company that doesn't really have any such thing as circulation or readership."

HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS UNDER A FAKE NAME? Jeff Gannon's real name is James Guckert. (He told Wolf Blitzer that he changed his name because "Jeff Gannon" was easier to pronounce.) Although all applications for White House press passes are supposed to be thoroughly vetted, White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said he was unaware that Gannon was using an alias. His predecessor, Ari Fleischer, also pleads ignorance. Gannon signed in to the White House each day as "Jeff Guckert," a name which did not match his pass ­ yet no one seemed to thing that was strange. In fact, no one at the White House seems overly concerned with what amounts to a stunning national security breach.

WHAT IS GANNON'S CONNECTION TO THE VALERIE PLAME CASE? Jeff Gannon has been interviewed by FBI agents who are investigating another security breach in the White House, namely, the leaking of CIA agent Valerie Plame's name to the press. So far, Gannon has been coy, giving "conflicting signals, over many months, concerning whether he saw a secret document or merely knew about it from other sources." Today he says he never really saw the memo, he'd only read about it in the Wall Street Journal. Reps. Conyers and Slaughter are asking Patrick Fitzgerald, the lead prosecutor in the Plame investigation, to subpoena the journal Gannon kept over the past two years to find out what Gannon actually knew, and when.

SOCIAL SECURITY ­ HOUSE PRIVATIZATION LEADER A WALL ST. LUSH: The Republican chairman of the House Social Security Subcommittee, Louisiana Rep. Jim McCrery, has accepted nearly $200,000 in contributions over four years from the very same Wall Street firms that would likely reap billions if President Bush's privatization scheme is made law. Campaign for America's Future, a progressive advocacy group, yesterday accused McCrery of a severe conflict of interest, and announced plans to run "newspaper advertisements against Mr. McCrery under the headline 'Who Does This Man Work For?' in his hometown, Shreveport," the New York Times reports. McCrery responded by attacking the group's "extreme liberal bias," while ignoring the substantive charges.