Diebold Facts - From a Dkos Diary
* ES&S
and Diebold count 80% of all votes in America.
* Diebold also makes ATM machines. Their ATM machines, unlike their electronic
voting machines during the 2004 election, provide
paper receipts.
* ES&S
managed many aspects of the 2004 election, including voter registration,
printing of ballots, the programming of their voting machines, tabulation of
votes (often with armed guards keeping the media and members of the public who
wished to witness the count at bay) and the first reporting of the results --
for 60 million voters in 47 states. Actual counting of votes by citizens
is very rare in the U.S., except for a few counties in Montana and other states,
where paper ballots are still hand-counted.
* The largest investors in ES&S, Sequoia (another voting machine company),
and Diebold are government defense contractors Northrup-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin,
Electronic Data Systems (EDS) and Accenture. Diebold hired Scientific Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) of San Diego to develop the software security
in their voting machines. A
majority of officials on SAIC's board are former members of either the Pentagon
or the CIA including:
- Army Gen. Wayne Downing, formerly of the NSC
- Bobby Ray Inman; former CIA Director
- Retired Adm. William Owens, former vice chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Robert Gates, another former director of the CIA.
* The U.S.'s largest voting machine company, ES&S,
is owned by The Omaha World Herald.
* Diebold
has its corporate headquarters in Ohio.
* Diebold chairman, president, and C.E.O., Walden O'Dell, is a prominent Bush
supporter and fund-raiser who proclaimed in 2003 that he was "committed
to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."
(See "Hack the Vote," by Michael Shnayerson, Vanity Fair, April 2004.)
* The
vice president of E.S.&S. and the president of Diebold are brothers.
* Diebold and ES&S's other major "competitor", Sequoia, is
owned by a partner member of the Carlyle Group, which has substantial
ties to the Bush family and friends.
* Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be chairman of AIS, which later became
ES&S. He
became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines in Nebraska
in what was a major upset.
* Senator Hagel, who was on the short-list of G.W. Bush's VP candidates, was
caught concealing information about his ownership of ES&S by the
Senate Ethics Committee, even though he was officially absolved of improperly
hiding information.
* One of the longest-serving Diebold directors is W.R. "Tim" Timken.
Since 1991 the Timken Company and members of the
Timken family have contributed more than a million dollars to the Republican
Party and to GOP presidential candidates such as George W. Bush. Between
2000 and 2002 alone, Timken's Canton-based bearing and steel company gave more
than $350,000 to Republican causes, while Timken himself gave more than $120,000.
In 2004, he was one of George W. Bush's campaign Pioneers, and pulled in more
than $350,000 for the president's reelection bid.
* In 2003, a cadre of computer scientists showed that the software running Diebold's
new machines can be hacked with relative ease.
* On a CNBC cable TV program, Black Box Voting (which opposes electronic voting)
executive Bev Harris showed
guest host Howard Dean how to alter vote totals within 90 seconds by
entering a two-digit code in a hidden program on Diebold's election software.
"This is not a bug or accidental oversight," Harris said. "It
is there on purpose."
* Managers
of a subsidiary of Diebold once included a cocaine trafficker, a man
who conducted fraudulent stock transactions and a programmer jailed for falsifying
computer records. The programmer, Jeffrey Dean, wrote and maintained proprietary
code used to count hundreds of thousands of votes as senior vice president of
Global Election Systems, or GES. Diebold purchased GES in January 2002. According
to a public court document released before GES hired him, Dean served time in
a Washington state correctional facility for stealing money and tampering with
computer files in a scheme that "involved a high degree of sophistication
and planning." He left when Diebold acquired GES.
Voting irregularities in Maryland:
* According
to a report to the Montgomery County Election Board, dated December
13, 2004, there were two broad levels of problems with Diebold machines. 7%
of units (189) failed. This included failure to boot up, screen freezes and
a variety of other problems. Screen freezes, which occurred on 106 voting units
were "the most serious of errors" because many "froze when the
voter pressed the Cast Ballot button." As a result "election judges
are unable to provide substantial confirmation that the vote was in fact counted."
In addition there were "122 suspect units (5%) were identified because
the unit had few votes captured compared to other voting units in the polling
place.
* Also in Montgomery Co., computer memory cards where vote totals are stored
inside each voting machine were
unreadable in multiple counties.
Voting irregularities in Ohio:
* More
than 35 Ohio counties used electronic voting machines made by Diebold
and up to 50,000 Diebold touch-screen machines and 20,000 scanners of paper
ballots were used in 38 states during the November 2004 election.
* In Butler County, a
Democrat running for the State Supreme Court chief justice received 61,559 votes.
The Kerry-Edwards ticket drew about 5,000 fewer votes, at 56,243. This
judicial candidate also outpolled the Kerry-Edwards ticket in 11 other counties.
* In
Cuyahoga County, which includes the city of Cleveland, two largely black
precincts on the East Side voted like this: In Precinct 4F: Kerry, 290; Bush,
21; Peroutka, 215. In Precinct 4N: Kerry, 318; Bush, 11; Badnarik, 163. Mr.
Peroutka and Mr. Badnarik are, respectively, the presidential candidates of
the Constitution and Libertarian Parties. By way of contrast, in 2000,
Ralph Nader's best year, the total vote received in Precinct 4F by all third-party
candidates combined was eight.
* In
Montgomery County, two precincts recorded a combined undervote of almost 6,000.
An "undervote" means the voter made selections for lesser offices,
but did not vote for President. In these two precincts alone, that number
represents an undervote of 25%, in a county where undervoting averages out at
just 2%. Democratic precincts had 75% more undervotes than Republican ones.
* In Precinct lB of Gahanna, in Franklin County, a computerized voting machine
recorded a total of 4,258 votes for Bush and 260 votes for Kerry. In
that precinct, however, there are only 800 registered voters, of whom 638 showed
up.
* In Miami County, the Concord Southwest and Concord South precincts boasted
incredibly high 98.5% and 94.27% turnouts, respectively, both
of them registering overwhelming majorities for Bush. Miami County
also managed to report 19,000 additional votes for Bush after 100% of the precincts
had reported on Election Day.
* In Mahoning County, Washington Post reporters found that many people had been
victims of "vote hopping," i.e., voting machines highlighted
a choice of one candidate after the voter had recorded a preference for another.
* Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican, arranged
for ample voting booths in GOP areas and a shortage in liberal college towns
and minority precincts. Despite the huge increase in new voter registration
(91% of which was Democratic), Blackwell provided fewer total voting machines
than were used in 2000.
*
Christopher Hitchens: "In practically every case [in Ohio] where
lines were too long or machines too few the foul-up was in a Democratic county
or precinct, and in practically every case where machines produced impossible
or improbable outcomes it was the challenger who suffered and the actual or
potential Democratic voters who were shortchanged, discouraged, or held up to
ridicule as chronic undervoters or as sudden converts to fringe-party losers."
* At least of 40
of 798 ES&S machines that were personally monitored in Ohio shut down
and flashed a message that repair was needed during the 2004 election. These
machines could not be made to report a final printed vote tally.
Voting irregularities in Florida:
* In the 2000 election,
in Volusia County, Florida, a Diebold-made central ballot-counting computer
showed a
Socialist Party candidate receiving more than 9,000 votes and Vice President
Al Gore getting minus 19,000. Another 4,000 votes poured into the plus
column for Bush that didn't belong there.
* ES&S voting machines in Florida may
have awarded George W. Bush up to 260,000 more votes than he should have received,
according to a statistical analysis conducted by University of California, Berkeley
graduate students and a professor. The total number of excessive votes ranged
between 130,000 and 260,000, depending on what kind of problem caused the excess
votes. The counties most affected by the anomaly were heavily Democratic. A
sociology professor said the chance for such a discrepancy to occur was less
than 1 in 1,000.
* While the approximated Florida discrepancy would not overcome a reported 350,000
vote Bush lead, no meaningful recount can ever be carried out because Diebold
machines do not leave a paper trail of any sort.
* Kathy Dopp examined the State of Florida's county-by-county record of votes
cast and people registered by party affiliation in the days immediately following
the election. Tthe
numbers Dopp looked at showed widespread election anomalies in 47 of the state's
67 counties. The discrepancies did not occur so much in the touch-screen
counties, where public scrutiny would naturally be focused, but in counties
where optically screened paper ballots were fed into a central tabulator PC,
which is highly vulnerable to hacking. Colin Shea of Zogby International
analyzed and double-checked Dopp's figures and confirmed that optical-scan counties
gave Bush 16% more votes than he should have gotten. "This 16% would
not be strange if it were spread across counties more or less evenly,"
Shea explains, but it is not. In 11 different counties, the "actual"
Bush tallies were 50-100% higher than expected. In one county, where 88% of
voters are registered Democrats, Bush got nearly two-thirds of the vote -- three
times more than predicted by Shea's statistical model. "In 21 counties,
more than 50% of Democrats would have to have defected to Bush to account for
the results," Shea says. "In four counties at least 70% [defection]
would have been required. These results are absurdly unlikely."
* In 47 Florida counties, initial vote tallies showed that the
total number of presidential votes exceeded the total number of voters who showed
up at the polls. Palm Beach County recorded 90,774 more votes than voters
and Miami Dade had 51,979 more, while relatively honest Orange County had only
1,648 more votes than voters. Overall, Florida reported 237,522 more presidential
votes (7.59 million) than citizens who turned out to cast ballots (7.35 million).
These anomalies evaporated, without explanation, when Florida issued its last
set of poll numbers.
* In Broward Country, the central tabulating machine was incorrectly programmed
to expect only 32,000 votes from each precinct; when more votes were received,
the
machine started counting backwards. The problem existed in the 2002
elections in Broward County but was never fixed. Throughout Florida, as in most
tossup states, poll monitors saw prospective voters leaving because of long
lines. There were numerous reports of sub-par facilities and faulty equipment
in minority neighborhoods.
* Several dozen voters in six states -- particularly Democrats in Florida --
said
the wrong candidate appeared on their touch-screen machine's checkout screen
(i.e. they voted one way and the result which appeared was the opposite).
* Keith Olbermann demonstrated on MSNBC's Countdown program that many Florida
counties where Democrats allegedly "crossed over" were voting Republican
for the first time. He also poked another hole in the theory that these
voters were "Dixiecrats" when he noted, "On the same Florida
Democratic ballots where Bush scored big, people supported highly Democratic
measures -- such as raising the state minimum wage $1 above the federal level.
This
indicates that only the presidential voting was rigged."
* Moreover, the 18 switchover Florida counties were not in the panhandle or
near the Georgia border, but
were scattered throughout the state. For instance, voters in Glades
County (Everglades region) registered 64.8% Republican but cast 38.3% more votes
for Bush than for Kerry. Hardee County (between Bradenton and Sebring) registered
63.8% Democratic but officially gave Bush 135% more votes than Kerry.
The discrepancies
between exit polls and vote tabulations where electronic voting was used:
- Concerning the discrepancies between exit polls and the
final vote tally in 2004, Dr. Steven F. Freeman, faculty member of the
University of Pennsylvania determined that the likelihood of Kerry receiving
only 47.1% in Florida, given that the exit polls indicated 49.7% is
less than 3 in 1,000. Although Kerry did carry Pennsylvania, the likelihood
of his receiving only 50.8% given that the exit polls indicated 54.1% is less
than 2 in 1,000. Similarly the likelihood of Kerry receiving only 48.5% in Ohio,
given the exit polls indicated 52.1% is less than 1 in 1,000 (.0008). Freeman
says, "The likelihood of any two of these statistical anomalies occurring
together is on the order of one-in-a-million. The odds against all three occurring
together are 250 million to 1. As much as we can say in social science that
something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted
and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states could have
been due to chance or random error."
- In 10 states where there were verifiable paper trails -- or no electronic
machines -- the
final results hardly differed from initial exit polls. Exit polls and
final counts in Missouri, Louisiana, Maine and Utah, for instance, varied by
1% or less. In non-paper-trail states, however, there were significant differences.
Florida saw a shift from Kerry +1% in the exit polls to Bush +5% at evening's
end. In Ohio, Kerry went from +3% to -3%. Other big discrepancies in key states
were: Minnesota (from +10% to +4%), New Mexico (+4 to -1), Nevada (+1 to -3),
Wisconsin (+7 to +0.4), Colorado (-2 to -5), North Carolina (-4 to -13), Iowa
(+1 to -1), New Hampshire (+14 to +1) and Pennsylvania (+8 to +2). Exit polls
also had Kerry winning the national popular vote by 3%.
Miscellaneous:
- On November 10, 2004, Keith Olbermann reported that computerized balloting
in North Carolina was so thoroughly messed up that all statewide voting may
have to be recounted. A Craven County, N.C. district recorded
11,283 more votes than there were voters, overturning the results of a regional
race.